Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (5):275-278 (2010)
The principal objective for most patients seeking orthodontic services is a detectable improvement in their dentofacial appearance. Orthodontic treatment, in the mind of the patient, is something that makes you look better, feel better about yourself, and perhaps enhances your social possibilities, ie, to find a companion or make a positive impression during a job interview. Orthodontics, as a speciality, has collectively advanced the idea that enhanced occlusion (bite) improves the health and longevity of the dentition, and as a result many patients seeking orthodontic services affirm that their secondary goal of treatment is an oral health benefit. It would appear that there is some disparity between the end-user of orthodontic services and the orthodontic provider's perception of what constitutes orthodontic need. The aim of this paper is to examine two contrasting models that characterise how dentists ‘sell’ orthodontic services to patients and to discuss the conflict between professional ethics, practice management and evidence-based decision-making in orthodontic practice
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Asymmetrien Bei der Einschätzung des Kieferorthopädischen BehandlungsbedarfsAsymmetries of the Public and Providers Views of the Orthodontic Treatment Need Orthodontic Practice and Orthodontic Standards as an Area of Conflicts Between Patients, Physicians and Society.Hartmut Bettin, Alexander Spassov & Micha H. Werner - 2015 - Ethik in der Medizin 27 (3):183-196.
Similar books and articles
Punishing the Guilty, Not Punishing the Innocent.Richard Lippke - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):462-488.
The Business Ethics of Short Selling and Naked Short Selling.James J. Angel & Douglas M. McCabe - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1):239 - 249.
Not Penal Substitution but Vicarious Punishment.Mark C. Murphy - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):253-273.
Punishing the Innocent — Unintentionally.Alan Wertheimer - 1977 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):45 – 65.
Ethical Reasoning in an Equitable Relief Innocent Spouse Context.Sean Valentine & Gary Fleischman - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 45 (4):325 - 339.
Is It Better That ten Guilty Persons Go Free Than That One Innocent Person Be Convicted?Vidar Halvorsen - 2004 - Criminal Justice Ethics 23 (2):3-13.
The Ethics and Efficacy of Selling National Citizenship.Shaheen Borna & James M. Stearns - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (2):193 - 207.
Malicious Pleasure Evaluated: Is Pleasure an Unconditional Good?Irwin Goldstein - 2003 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (1):24–31.
On the Common Saying That It is Better That Ten Guilty Persons Escape Than That One Innocent Suffer: Pro and Con.Jeffrey Reiman & Ernest Den Haavang - 1990 - Social Philosophy and Policy 7 (2):226.
When a Person Feels That She Is Guilty and Believes That She Is Not Guilty.Juha Räikkä - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:149-152.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads27 ( #190,260 of 2,172,663 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,663 )
How can I increase my downloads?