Studia Logica 101 (3):467-482 (2013)
The axiom of choice ensures precisely that, in ZFC, every set is projective: that is, a projective object in the category of sets. In constructive ZF (CZF) the existence of enough projective sets has been discussed as an additional axiom taken from the interpretation of CZF in Martin-Löf’s intuitionistic type theory. On the other hand, every non-empty set is injective in classical ZF, which argument fails to work in CZF. The aim of this paper is to shed some light on the problem whether there are (enough) injective sets in CZF. We show that no two element set is injective unless the law of excluded middle is admitted for negated formulas, and that the axiom of power set is required for proving that “there are strongly enough injective sets”. The latter notion is abstracted from the singleton embedding into the power set, which ensures enough injectives both in every topos and in IZF. We further show that it is consistent with CZF to assume that the only injective sets are the singletons. In particular, assuming the consistency of CZF one cannot prove in CZF that there are enough injective sets. As a complement we revisit the duality between injective and projective sets from the point of view of intuitionistic type theory
|Keywords||Injective object Constructive set theory Axiom of powerset Intuitionistic type theory Axiom of choice|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
What Does It Take to Prove Fermat's Last Theorem? Grothendieck and the Logic of Number Theory.Colin Mclarty - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):359-377.
On Constructing Completions.Laura Crosilla, Hajime Ishihara & Peter Schuster - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (3):969-978.
Binary Refinement Implies Discrete Exponentiation.Peter Aczel, Laura Crosilla, Hajime Ishihara, Erik Palmgren & Peter Schuster - 2006 - Studia Logica 84 (3):361 - 368.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Injectives in Finitely Generated Universal Horn Classes.Michael H. Albert & Ross Willard - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):786-792.
Sets and Point-Sets: Five Grades of Set-Theoretic Involvement in Geometry.John P. Burgess - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:456 - 463.
Valuation Structure.Zhaohui Zhu, Zhenghua Pan, Shifu Chen & Wujia Zhu - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):1-23.
Hypersolver: A Graphical Tool for Commonsense Set Theory.Mujdat Pakkan & Varol Akman - 1995 - Philosophical Explorations.
Some Modifications of Scott's Theorem on Injective Spaces.Andrzej W. Jankowski - 1986 - Studia Logica 45 (2):155 - 166.
Intuitionistic Uniformity Principles for Propositions and Some Applications.W. Friedrich & H. Luckhardt - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (4):361 - 369.
Book Review: Peter Aczel. Non-Well-Founded Sets. [REVIEW]R. Hinnion - 1989 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (2):308-312.
Boolean Algebras and Orbits of the Lattice of R.E. Sets Modulo the Finite Sets.Peter Cholak - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (2):744-760.
Models of Non-Well-Founded Sets Via an Indexed Final Coalgebra Theorem.Benno van Den Berg & Federico de Marchi - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (3):767-791.
Positive Deissler Rank and the Complexity of Injective Modules.T. G. Kucera - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1):284-293.
When Cotorsion Modules Are Pure Injective.Ivo Herzog & Philipp Rothmaler - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):63-102.
Added to index2012-06-12
Total downloads19 ( #253,636 of 2,152,482 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,782 of 2,152,482 )
How can I increase my downloads?