Are There Enough Injective Sets?

Studia Logica 101 (3):467-482 (2013)
The axiom of choice ensures precisely that, in ZFC, every set is projective: that is, a projective object in the category of sets. In constructive ZF (CZF) the existence of enough projective sets has been discussed as an additional axiom taken from the interpretation of CZF in Martin-Löf’s intuitionistic type theory. On the other hand, every non-empty set is injective in classical ZF, which argument fails to work in CZF. The aim of this paper is to shed some light on the problem whether there are (enough) injective sets in CZF. We show that no two element set is injective unless the law of excluded middle is admitted for negated formulas, and that the axiom of power set is required for proving that “there are strongly enough injective sets”. The latter notion is abstracted from the singleton embedding into the power set, which ensures enough injectives both in every topos and in IZF. We further show that it is consistent with CZF to assume that the only injective sets are the singletons. In particular, assuming the consistency of CZF one cannot prove in CZF that there are enough injective sets. As a complement we revisit the duality between injective and projective sets from the point of view of intuitionistic type theory
Keywords Injective object  Constructive set theory  Axiom of powerset  Intuitionistic type theory  Axiom of choice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11225-011-9365-8
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,173
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Constructibility.Keith J. Devlin - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):864-867.
On Constructing Completions.Laura Crosilla, Hajime Ishihara & Peter Schuster - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (3):969-978.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sets and Point-Sets: Five Grades of Set-Theoretic Involvement in Geometry.John P. Burgess - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:456 - 463.
Valuation Structure.Zhaohui Zhu, Zhenghua Pan, Shifu Chen & Wujia Zhu - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):1-23.
Non-Well-Founded Sets.Peter Aczel - 1988 - Csli Lecture Notes.
Book Review: Peter Aczel. Non-Well-Founded Sets. [REVIEW]R. Hinnion - 1989 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (2):308-312.
Anti-Admissible Sets.Jacob Lurie - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):407-435.
Constructing Pure Injective Hulls.Wilfrid Hodges - 1980 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 45 (3):544-548.
Positive Deissler Rank and the Complexity of Injective Modules.T. G. Kucera - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1):284-293.
When Cotorsion Modules Are Pure Injective.Ivo Herzog & Philipp Rothmaler - 2009 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 9 (1):63-102.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

19 ( #253,636 of 2,152,482 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #399,782 of 2,152,482 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums