Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S1):225 - 237 (2009)
AbstractBackdating of stock options is an example of an agency problem. It has emerged despite all the measures (i.e., new regulations and additional corporate governance mechanisms) aimed at addressing such problems? Beyond such negative controlling measures, a more positive empowering approach based on ethics may also be necessary. What ethical measures need to be taken to address the agency problem? What values and norms should guide the board of directors in protecting the shareholders' interests? To examine these issues, we first discuss the role values and norms can play with respect to underlying corporate governance and the proper role of directors, such as transparency, accountability, integrity (which is reflected in proper mechanisms of checks and balances), and public responsibility. Second, we discuss various stakeholder approaches (e.g., government, directors, managers, and shareholders) by which conflicts of interest (i.e., the agency problem) can be addressed. Third, we assess the practice of backdating stock options, as an illustration of the agency problem, in terms of whether the practice is legally acceptable or ethically justifiable. Fourth, we proceed to an analysis of good corporate governance practice involving backdating options based on a series of ethical standards including: (1) trustworthiness; (2) utilitarianism; (3) justice; and (4) Kantianism. We conclude that while executive compensation schemes (e. g., stock options) were originally intended to help remedy the agency problem by tying together the interests of the executives and shareholders, these schemes may have actually become "part of the problem," and that the solution ultimately depends upon whether directors and executives accept that all of their actions must be based on a set of core ethical values
Similar books and articles
Strengthening the Ties that Bind: Preventing Corruption in the Executive Suite.Norman D. Bishara & Cindy A. Schipani - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 88 (S4):765-780.
Firm Linkages to Scandals via Directors and Professional Service Firms: Insights from the Backdating Scandal.Jay J. Janney & Steve Gove - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 140 (1):65-79.
Compensating Outside Directors with Stock: The Impact on Non-Primary Stakeholders. [REVIEW]Yuval Deutsch & Mike Valente - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (1):67-85.
Are Stock Options Grants to CEOs of Stagnant Firms Fair and Justified?Kiridaran Kanagaretnam, Gerald J. Lobo & Emad Mohammad - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 90 (1):137-155.
The limits of shareholder value.Peter Koslowski - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):137 - 148.
Does institutional quality moderate the relationship between corporate governance and stock liquidity? Evidence from the emerging market of Pakistan.Shuaib Ali, Wu Zhongxin, Zahid Ali, Guo Fei & Muhammad Abir Shahid Chowdhury - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Ethos is Destiny: Organizational Values and Compliance in Corporate Governance.Maria Fotaki, Spyros Lioukas & Irini Voudouris - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 166 (1):19-37.
Structure and Role of the Board of Directors according to the Company Law of Jordan: The Need for Revision.Bashar H. Malkawi - manuscript
Does Good Governance Matter to Institutional Investors? Evidence from the Enactment of Corporate Governance Guidelines.Armand Picou & Michael J. Rubach - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (1):55-67.
Ethics and the board of directors in Spain: The olivencia code of good governance. [REVIEW]José-Luis Fernández- Fernández - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 22 (3):233-247.
Balancing corporate and social interests: Corporate governance theory and practice.G. J. Rossouw - 2014 - African Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):28.
Corporate governance and trust in business: A matter of balance.G. J. Rossouw - 2005 - African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):1.
Outside director remuneration and the decision to grant CEO stock options.Kiridaran Kanagaretnam, Robert Mathieu & Ramachandran Ramanan - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):137-146.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Executive Pay and Legitimacy: Changing Discursive Battles Over the Morality of Excessive Manager Compensation. [REVIEW]Maria Joutsenvirta - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 116 (3):459-477.
Integrating emotion and other nonrational factors into ethics education and training in professional psychology.Yesim Korkut & Carole Sinclair - 2020 - Ethics and Behavior 30 (6):444-458.
Does CEO Risk-Aversion Affect Carbon Emission?Ashrafee Hossain, Samir Saadi & Abu S. Amin - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-28.
References found in this work
Tone at the Top: An Ethics Code for Directors?Mark S. Schwartz, Thomas W. Dunfee & Michael J. Kline - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):79-100.
Corporate Governance Reform and CEO Compensation: Intended and Unintended Consequences.Ella Mae Matsumura & Jae Yong Shin - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2):101-113.