Journal of Business Ethics 85 (S1):225 - 237 (2009)

Abstract
Backdating of stock options is an example of an agency problem. It has emerged despite all the measures (i.e., new regulations and additional corporate governance mechanisms) aimed at addressing such problems? Beyond such negative controlling measures, a more positive empowering approach based on ethics may also be necessary. What ethical measures need to be taken to address the agency problem? What values and norms should guide the board of directors in protecting the shareholders' interests? To examine these issues, we first discuss the role values and norms can play with respect to underlying corporate governance and the proper role of directors, such as transparency, accountability, integrity (which is reflected in proper mechanisms of checks and balances), and public responsibility. Second, we discuss various stakeholder approaches (e.g., government, directors, managers, and shareholders) by which conflicts of interest (i.e., the agency problem) can be addressed. Third, we assess the practice of backdating stock options, as an illustration of the agency problem, in terms of whether the practice is legally acceptable or ethically justifiable. Fourth, we proceed to an analysis of good corporate governance practice involving backdating options based on a series of ethical standards including: (1) trustworthiness; (2) utilitarianism; (3) justice; and (4) Kantianism. We conclude that while executive compensation schemes (e. g., stock options) were originally intended to help remedy the agency problem by tying together the interests of the executives and shareholders, these schemes may have actually become "part of the problem," and that the solution ultimately depends upon whether directors and executives accept that all of their actions must be based on a set of core ethical values
Keywords corporate governance  directors  agency problem  values  norms  backdating stock options
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9941-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Model Capturing Ethics and Executive Compensation.Waymond Rodgers & Susana Gago - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):189-202.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Limits of Shareholder Value.Peter Koslowski - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):137 - 148.
Corporate Governance and Trust in Business: A Matter of Balance.G. J. Rossouw - 2005 - African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):1.
Outside Director Remuneration and the Decision to Grant CEO Stock Options.Kiridaran Kanagaretnam, Robert Mathieu & Ramachandran Ramanan - 2004 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (s 2-3):137-146.
The Association Between Executive Stock Options and Corporate Performance: Evidence From Portugal.Sandra Alves - 2011 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 6 (2):203-223.
Corporate Governance in South Africa.G. J. Rossouw, A. van der Watt & D. P. Malan - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 37 (3):289-302.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
94 ( #115,902 of 2,454,732 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,745 of 2,454,732 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes