Divine Command Metaethics Modified Again

Journal of Religious Ethics 7 (1):66 - 79 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay presents a version of divine command metaethics inspired by recent work of Donnellan, Kripke, and Putnam on the relation between necessity and conceptual analysis. What we can discover a priori, by conceptual analysis, about the nature of ethical wrongness is that wrongness is the property of actions that best fills a certain role. What property that is cannot be discovered by conceptual analysis. But I suggest that theists should claim it is the property of being contrary to the commands of a loving God. This claim, if true, is a necessary but not an a priori truth. It also is a claim, not about the way in which some believers use the word 'wrong,' but about the wrongness that virtually everyone talks about. This position is distinguished from the author's previous views, and from a holistic development of the latter proposed by Jeffrey Stout.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,517

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine Command Metaethics Modified Again.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1999 - In Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 412-416.
Divine Commands Are Unnecessary for Moral Obligation.Erik Wielenberg - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 21 (1).
Divine Commands or Divine Attitudes?Matthey Carey Jordan - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (2):159-70.
Divine Command Ethics.Janine Marie Idziak - 1997 - In Charles Taliaferro & Philip L. Quinn (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 585–592.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
368 (#59,062)

6 months
26 (#139,494)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Against Arguments from Reference.Ron Mallon, Edouard Machery, Shaun Nichols & Stephen Stich - 2009 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (2):332 - 356.
Theological voluntarism.Mark Murphy - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2019.
Truthmakers and Modality.Ross Paul Cameron - 2008 - Synthese 164 (2):261 - 280.

View all 44 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references