Evil as Nothing: Contrasting Construals in Boethius and Anselm

Modern Schoolman 89 (3/4):131-145 (2012)
Abstract
Anselm inherited a Platonizing approach to philosophy from Augustine and Boethius. But he characteristically reworked what he found in their texts by questioning and disputing it into something more rigorous. In this paper, I compare and contrast Anselm’s treatment of the trope ‘evil is nothing, not a being’ withBoethius’s use of it in The Consolation of Philosophy. In the first section, I expose a fallacious argument form common to them both: paradigm Fness is identical with paradigm Gness; X participates in paradigm Fness and so is F; therefore, X participates in paradigm Gness and so is G. In the second section, I contrast Philosophy’s “strong medicine”—‘evil is nothing,’ ‘evil-doings are nothing,’ ‘evil humans do not exist’—with Anselm’s development of the point that injustice is a privation and so parasitic on the beings that are deprived. By contrast with Boethius, Anselm emphasizes that the willinstrument, will-power, the will’s action and turnings are something and so from God. Likewise, Anselm insists—pace Boethius—that Adam’s fallen race is still the human race. In the final section, I turnto Anselm’s distinction between injustice and disadvantage, his concession that some disadvantages are something, and his explanation of happiness in terms of advantage or bona sibi. For Anselm, happiness and justice break apart, so that it is possible in this world for the just to lack advantage. Moreover, in the world to come, the damned will suffer radical deprivation—not only of the justice, which they deserted, but of advantages. I contrastthis with Boethius’s insistence that virtue suffices for happiness and vice for unhappiness, and that there is no such thing as bad fortune. I conclude by pondering why Anselm treated disadvantage as a something rather than as a misfit between somethings.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI schoolman2012893/49
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,062
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Evil as Nothing.Marilyn McCord Adams - 2012 - Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):131-145.
The 'Origin' of Evil According to Anselm of Canterbury.Daniel Deme - 2002 - Heythrop Journal 43 (2):170–184.
Anselm on Freedom. [REVIEW]Thomas Williams - 2009 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009.
Anselm's Quiet Radicalism.Thomas Williams - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (1):1-20.
In Defense of Anselm.Mark Owen Webb - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Anselm on Ethics.Jeffrey E. Brower - 2004 - In Brian Davies & Brian Leftow (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. Cambridge University Press. pp. 222-56.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-16

Total views
14 ( #444,988 of 2,312,817 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #192,171 of 2,312,817 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature