- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Ethical issues in research involving minority populations: the process and outcomes of protocol review by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand [Book Review]
Pornpimon Adams, Waranya Wongwit, Krisana Pengsaa, Srisin Khusmith, Wijitr Fungladda, Warissara Chaiyaphan, Chanthima Limphattharacharoen, Sukanya Prakobtham & Jaranit Kaewkungwal
BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):33 (2013)
Abstract
Recruiting minorities into research studies requires special attention, particularly when studies involve “extra-vulnerable” participants with multiple vulnerabilities, e.g., pregnant women, the fetuses/neonates of ethnic minorities, children in refugee camps, or cross-border migrants. This study retrospectively analyzed submissions to the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine (FTM-EC) in Thailand. Issues related to the process and outcomes of proposal review, and the main issues for which clarification/revision were requested on studies, are discussed extensivelyLinks
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- europepmc.org
(no proxy) - link.springer.com (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [2] (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [3] (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com [2] (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com [3] (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com [4] (no proxy)
- biomedcentral.com [5] (no proxy)
- ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Protecting and respecting the vulnerable: existing regulations or further protections?Stephanie R. Solomon - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (1):17-28.
Research Ethics in a Business School Context: The Establishment of a Review Committee and the Primary Issues of Concern. [REVIEW]Michelle Cunningham - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (1):43-66.
The Importance of Ethical Appraisal in Social Science Research: Reviewing a Faculty of Humanities' Research Ethics Committee. [REVIEW]Katinka De Wet - 2010 - Journal of Academic Ethics 8 (4):301-314.
Regulating Human Participants Protection in Medical Research and the Accreditation of Medical Research Ethics Committees in the Netherlands.Marcel J. H. Kenter - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):33-43.
Ethical problems in research on risky behaviors and risky populations.Sandra Scarr - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (2):147 – 155.
Due process procedures in faculty grievance codes.Douglas M. McCabe - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (15):1653-1662.
The activity of French Research Ethics Committees and characteristics of biomedical research protocols involving humans: a retrospective cohort study. [REVIEW]Evelyne Decullier, Véronique Lhéritier & François Chapuis - 2005 - BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-10.
The Low Risk Research Ethics Application Process at CQUniversity Australia.Teresa Moore & Kristy Richardson - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):211-230.
Incorporating ethics into business students' research projects: A process approach. [REVIEW]Michael Jay Polonsky - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (11):1227-1241.
Ethics and participation: Reflections on research with street children.Lorraine Young & Hazel Barrett - 2001 - Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (2):130 – 134.
The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives.Maureen H. Fitzgerald, Paul A. Phillips & Elisa Yule - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):377 – 395.
Ethical issues in reporting and referring in research with low-income minority children.Diane Scott-Jones - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (2):97 – 108.
The unique ethical challenges of conducting research in the rehabilitation medicine population.Jeff Blackmer - 2003 - BMC Medical Ethics 4 (1):1-6.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-09-12
Downloads
195 (#99,055)
6 months
6 (#512,819)
2013-09-12
Downloads
195 (#99,055)
6 months
6 (#512,819)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The effect of study type on research ethics committees’ queries in medical studies.Saara M. Happo, Arja Halkoaho, Soili M. Lehto & Tapani Keränen - 2017 - Research Ethics 13 (3-4):115-127.
References found in this work
Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations.C. C. Denny & C. Grady - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (7):382-385.
Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?E. Angell & M. Dixon-Woods - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):130-132.
The quality of informed consent in a clinical research study in Thailand.Christine Pace, Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Theshinee Chuenyam, Chris Duncombe, Judith D. Bebchuk, David Wendler, Jorge A. Tavel, Laura A. McNay, Praphan Phanuphak & Heidi P. Forster - 2004 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 27 (1):9-17.
Module three: Vulnerable/special participant populations.Jason P. Lott - 2005 - Developing World Bioethics 5 (1):30–54.
Vulnerability in Research: Individuals with Limited Financial and/or Social Resources.Christine Grady - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):19-27.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo