Ethical research in delirium: Arguments for including decisionally incapacitated subjects

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):169-174 (2010)
Here we describe how more important findings were obtained in a delirium study by using an informal assessment of mental capacity, and, in those who lacked capacity, obtaining consent later when or if capacity returned or a proxy was found. From a total of 233 patients 23 patients lacked capacity as judged by our informal capacity judgment and 210 did not. Of those who lacked capacity, 13 agreed to enter in the study. Six of them regained capacity later. When these 13 participants were excluded from analysis, significant findings were no longer evident. These results show that by the inclusion of subjects who lacked capacity the results of analyses of the condition from whish they suffer are altered. We suggest that this approach to the study of delirium is more ethical than the usual system of strict exclusion of people who lack capacity to give consent and for whom assent is not available.
Keywords Ethics  Delirium  Bias  Capacity  Consent
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-009-9120-y
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,590
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Autonomy and the Psychiatric Patient.Eric Matthews - 2000 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):59–70.
Capacity, Consent, and Selection Bias in a Study of Delirium.D. Adamis - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):137-143.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mental Capacity and the Applied Phenomenology of Judgement.Wayne Martin & Ryan Hickerson - 2013 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (1):195-214.
Metatheory of Storage Capacity Limits.Nelson Cowan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):154-176.
Decision-Making Capacity and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.Peter Lucas - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):117-122.
What is More Explanatory, Processing Capacity or Processing Speed?Nelson Cowan - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):835-836.
Schizophrenia, Mental Capacity, and Rational Suicide.Jeanette Hewitt - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (1):63-77.
Capacity, Mental Mechanisms, and Unwise Decisions.Tim Thornton - 2011 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 18 (2):127-132.
Capacity, Consent, and Selection Bias in a Study of Delirium.D. Adamis - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):137-143.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

29 ( #176,644 of 2,168,526 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #346,757 of 2,168,526 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums