Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):433-437 (1997)

Authors
Fred Adams
University of Delaware
Ken Aizawa
Rutgers University - Newark
Abstract
In “A Theory of Content, 11: The Theory,” Jerry Fodor presents two reasons why his asymmetric causal dependency theory does not lead to the conclusion that syntactic items “X” mean proximal sensory stimulations, rather than distal environmental objects. Here we challenge Fodor’s reasoning.
Keywords Asymmetry  Causation  Content  Dependence  Language  Fodor, J
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0038-4283
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1997.tb00845.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,827
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Mentalese Semantics and the Naturalized Mind.Charles E. M. Dunlop - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (1):77-94.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
83 ( #124,768 of 2,432,721 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #294,374 of 2,432,721 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes