FMRI evidence for and behavioral evidence against the planning–control model
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-24 (2004)
Abstract
Consistent with the planning–control model, recent fMRI data reveal that the inferior parietal lobe, the frontal lobes, and the basal ganglia are involved in motor planning. Inconsistent with the planning–control model, however, recent behavioral data reveal a spatial repulsion effect, indicating that the visual context surrounding the target can sometimes influence the on-line control of goal-directed action.DOI
10.1017/s0140525x04220027
My notes
Similar books and articles
Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.Scott Glover - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):3-24.
Do movement planning and control represent independent modules?Valérie Gaveau & Michel Desmurget - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36.
Further evidence for, and some against, a planning–control dissociation.Paul van Donkelaar & Paul R. Dassonville - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):52-53.
Evidence from optic ataxia does not support a distinction between planning and control mechanisms in human motor control.Roger Newport, Sally Pears & Stephen R. Jackson - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):45-46.
Planning, control, and the illusion of explanation.David A. Westwood - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):54-55.
At least some electrophysiological and behavioural data cannot be reconciled with the planning–control model.P. Paolo Battaglini, Paolo Bernardis & Nicola Bruno - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):24-25.
Scale errors by very young children: A dissociation between action planning and control.Judy S. DeLoache - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):32-33.
Planning and control of action as solutions to an independence of visual mechanisms.James G. Phillips, Thomas J. Triggs & James W. Meehan - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):46-47.
The role of feedforward control in motor planning.Marta Olivetti Belardinelli & Demis Basso - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):896-897.
The planning–control model and spatio-motor deficits following brain damage.H. Branch Coslett & Laurel J. Buxbaum - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):31-32.
Planning differences for chromaticity- and luminance-defined stimuli: A possible problem for Glover's planning–control model.Charles E. Wright & Charles Chubb - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):55-56.
The organization of action representations in posterior parietal cortex.Scott H. Johnson-Frey - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):40-41.
Defining visuomotor dissociations and an application to the oculomotor system.Bruce Bridgeman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):27-28.
Planning and control: Are they separable in the brain? Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.Myrka Zago, Francesco Lacquaniti, Alexandra Battaglia-Mayer & Roberto Caminiti - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):56-57.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
24 (#483,852)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
2009-01-28
Downloads
24 (#483,852)
6 months
1 (#454,876)
Historical graph of downloads
