Farewell to certitude: Einstein's novelty on induction and deduction, fallibilism

Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31 (1):19-37 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In the late 19th century great changes in theories of light and electricity were in direct conflict with certitude, the view that scientific knowledge is infallible. What is, then, the epistemic status of scientific theory? To resolve this issue Duhem and Poincaré proposed images of fallible knowledge, Instrumentalism and Conventionalism, respectively. Only in 1919–1922, after Einstein's relativity was published, he offered arguments to support Fallibilism, the view that certainty cannot be achieved in science. Though Einstein did not consider Duhem's Instrumentalism, he argued against Poincaré's Conventionalism. Hitherto, Einstein's Fallibilism, as presented at first in a rarely known essay of 1919, was left in the dark. Recently, Howard obscured its meaning. Einstein's essay was never translated into English. In my paper I provide its translation and attempt to shed light on Einstein's view and its context; I also direct attention to Einstein's images of philosophical opportunism in scientific practice



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

" Was Einstein a philosopher?" Deduction vs. induction, the end of certitude and conventionalism.Am Adam - 1999 - In S. Smets J. P. Van Bendegem G. C. Cornelis (ed.), Metadebates on Science. Vub-Press & Kluwer. pp. 6--1.
On the justification of deduction and induction.Franz Huber - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (3):507-534.
Induction and deduction in physics (1919).Albert Einstein - 2005 - Scientiae Studia 3 (4):663-664.
Newman the Fallibilist.Logan Paul Gage & Frederick D. Aquino - 2023 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):29-47.
Karl Poppers problematische Sichtweise der Induktion.Norbert Hoerster - 2012 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):1-10.
Karl Poppers problematische Sichtweise der Induktion.Norbert Hoerster - 2012 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 1 (26):1-10.
Adaptive Logics and the Integration of Induction and Deduction.Joke Meheus - 2004 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 11:93-120.


Added to PP

109 (#163,332)

6 months
15 (#173,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Logik der Forschung.Karl R. Popper (ed.) - 1935 - Wien: J. Springer.
Logik der Forschung.Karl Popper - 1934 - Erkenntnis 5 (1):290-294.
On the method of theoretical physics.Albert Einstein - 1934 - Philosophy of Science 1 (2):163-169.
La théorie physique: son objet et sa structure.P. Duhem - 1906 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 61:324-327.

View all 18 references / Add more references