How Can a Ratings-based Method for Assessing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Provide an Incentive to Firms Excluded from Socially Responsible Investment Indices to Invest in CSR?
Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):899-905 (2008)
AbstractSocially Responsible Investment indices play a major role in the stock markets. A connection between doing good and doing well in business is implied. Leading indices, such as the Domini Social Index and others, exemplify the movement toward investing in socially responsible corporations. However, the question remains: Does the ratings-based methodology for assessing corporate social responsibility provide an incentive to firms excluded from SRI indices to invest in CSR? Not in its current format. The ratings-based methodology employed by SRI indices in their selection processes excludes many corporations by creating limited-membership lists. This received ratings-based structure is yet to offer an incentive for most of the excluded corporations to invest in improving their levels of CSR. We, therefore, ask under what circumstances a ratings-based method for assessing CSR could provide an incentive to firms excluded from SRI indices to invest in CSR. In this article, we attempt to offer a theoretical reply to this question. We show that when all firms are publicly ranked according to SRI index parameters, such indices can indeed create a market incentive for increased investment by firms in improving their performance in the area of social responsibility. We further show that this incentive tapers off as the amount of investment required exceeds a certain point or if the amount of payback on that investment fails to reach a certain threshold.
Similar books and articles
How can a ratings-based method for assessing corporate social responsibility (csr) provide an incentive to firms excluded from socially responsible investment indices to invest in csr?Avshalom Madhala Adam & Tal Shavit - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):899 - 905.
Corporate social responsibility and financial disclosures: An alternative explanation for increased disclosure. [REVIEW]David S. Gelb & Joyce A. Strawser - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (1):1 - 13.
Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders.Amir Barnea & Amir Rubin - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1):71 - 86.
Socially Responsible Investing: Can It Produce Acceptable Investment Results?Stanley F. Fox - 1991 - Dissertation, Walden University
Communicating corporate responsibility to investors: The changing role of the investor relations function. [REVIEW]Kai Hockerts & Lance Moir - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):85-98.
Social impact as a measure of fit between firm activities and stakeholder expectations.Lisa Papania, Daniel M. Shapiro & John Peloza - 2008 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (1):3.
Sovereign Bonds and Socially Responsible Investment.Bastien Drut - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 92 (S1):131 - 145.
Approaching Socially Responsible Investment with a Comprehensive Ratings Scheme: Total Social Impact.Stephen Dillenburg, Timothy Greene & Homer Erekson - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):167 - 177.
Corporate Social Responsibility: Is it Rewarded by the Corporate Bond Market? A Critical Note. [REVIEW]Klaus-Michael Menz - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (1):117-134.
Which Dimensions of Social Responsibility Concern Financial Investors?Isabelle Girerd-Potin, Sonia Jimenez-Garcès & Pascal Louvet - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 121 (4):1-18.
The Primary Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethicality in Corporate Reputation: An Empirical Study.Bruno Dyck Kent Walker - 2014 - Business and Society Review 119 (1):147-174.
Measuring Investors' Socially Responsible Preferences in Mutual Funds.Iván Barreda-Tarrazona, Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez & Mª Rosario Balaguer-Franch - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (2):305-330.
Understanding Socially Responsible Investing: The Effect of Decision Frames and Trade-off Options. [REVIEW]Katherina Glac - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):41 - 55.
Socially Responsible Investing: An Investor Perspective. [REVIEW]Thomas C. Berry & Joan C. Junkus - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 112 (4):707-720.
Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism, and socially responsible investments: Ethical, strategic, and governance implications. [REVIEW]Terrence Guay, Jonathan P. Doh & Graham Sinclair - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):125-139.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy.Ester Clementino & Richard Perkins - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 171 (2):379-397.
CSR Rating Agencies: What is Their Global Impact?Steven Scalet & Thomas F. Kelly - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (1):69-88.
Comparing the Evolution of CSR Reporting to that of Financial Reporting.Daniel Tschopp & Ronald J. Huefner - 2015 - Journal of Business Ethics 127 (3):565-577.
Does integrity matter for CSR practice in organizations? The mediating role of transformational leadership.José M. C. Veríssimo & Teresa M. C. Lacerda - 2015 - Business Ethics: A European Review 24 (1):34-51.
CSR Disclosure Items Used as Fairness Heuristics in the Investment Decision.Helen Brown-Liburd, Jeffrey Cohen & Valentina L. Zamora - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 152 (1):275-289.
References found in this work
The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. [REVIEW]Russell Sparkes & Christopher J. Cowton - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):45-57.
An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance.Paul Cox, Stephen Brammer & Andrew Millington - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 52 (1):27-43.
Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: towards corporate accountability.Carmen Valor - 2005 - Business and Society Review 110 (2):191-212.
Investing in socially responsible companies is a must for public pension funds – because there is no better alternative.S. Prakash Sethi - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 56 (2):99 - 129.
Investing in Socially Responsible Companies is a must for Public Pension Funds? Because there is no Better Alternative.S. Prakash Sethi - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 56 (2):99-129.