Julian of Norwich: Problems of Evil and the Seriousness of Sin

Philosophia 39 (3):433-447 (2011)

Abstract
Julian of Norwich emphasizes God’s eternal and unchanging love for humankind. Her visions show how God is not angry with our sins and so has no need to forgive us. God does not shame or blame us but excuses us and plans how to reward and compensate us for sin. In relation to Mother Jesus, we remain dear lovely children who need help, correction, and education. Although these remarks suggest to some that Julian must be soft on sin, that she has no adequate appreciation of the worthiness of God or the dignity of human nature, I argue that this is far from the case. On the contrary, she makes Divine worthiness axiomatic and urges readers to live into it. She relocates human dignity not in its intrinsic value but in our centrality to God’s plan. She measures the seriousness of sin in terms of the real hard work it takes to rear us up out of it: crucifixion for Christ, the hell of being a sinner and the crucifixion of life-long penance for us. Nevertheless, the brightness of her visions dominates with her assurance that despite the sin-produced sufferings of this present life, all will be well
Keywords Blame  Evil  Forgiveness  Love  Sin
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-011-9309-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 48,878
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sin and Human Cognition of God.Rik Peels - 2011 - Scottish Journal of Theology 64 (4):390-409.
God is Not the Author of Sin.Katherin A. Rogers - 2007 - Faith and Philosophy 24 (3):300-310.
Original Sin and a Broad Free Will Defense.W. Paul Franks - 2012 - Philosophia Christi 14 (2):353–371.
Atonement Without Satisfaction.Richard Cross - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (4):397-416.
Taking Sin Seriously.Darlene Fozard Weaver - 2003 - Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):45 - 74.
Penance.Jacqueline A. Laing - 2012 - In George Kurian (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Christian Civilisation. Blackwell.
Augustine on the Origin and Progress of Evil.J. Patout Burns - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):9-27.
Schleiermacher on Evil.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (4):563-583.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-03-25

Total views
123 ( #70,746 of 2,309,563 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #104,333 of 2,309,563 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature