Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2018)

Authors
Abstract
The definition of art is controversial in contemporary philosophy. Whether art can be defined has also been a matter of controversy. The philosophical usefulness of a definition of art has also been debated. Contemporary definitions can be classified with respect to the dimensions of art they emphasize. One distinctively modern, conventionalist, sort of definition focuses on art’s institutional features, emphasizing the way art changes over time, modern works that appear to break radically with all traditional art, the relational properties of artworks that depend on works’ relations to art history, art genres, etc. – more broadly, on the undeniable heterogeneity of the class of artworks. The more traditional, less conventionalist sort of definition defended in contemporary philosophy makes use of a broader, more traditional concept of aesthetic properties that includes more than art-relational ones, and puts more emphasis on art’s pan-cultural and trans-historical characteristics – in sum, on commonalities across the class of artworks. Hybrid definitions aim to do justice to both the traditional aesthetic dimension as well as to the institutional and art-historical dimensions of art, while privileging neither.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,677
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of the Power of Judgment.Immanuel Kant - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Concepts and Stereotypes.Georges Rey - 1983 - Cognition 15 (1-3):237-62.
Aesthetic Concepts.Frank Sibley - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (4):421-450.

View all 60 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Aesthetic Engagement Theory of Art.Patrick Grafton-Cardwell - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
Communication and Content.Prashant Parikh - 2019 - Berlin, Germany: Language Science Press.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Cluster Account of Art Reconsidered.Aaron Meskin - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):388-400.
A Naturalist Definition of Art.Denis Dutton - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (3):367–377.
On the Prototype Theory of Concepts and the Definition of Art.Thomas Adajian - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (3):231–236.
The Intentional-Attributive Definition of Art.Alex Aliyev - 2009 - Consciousness, Literature and the Arts 10 (2).
Music, Art, and Metaphysics.Jerrold Levinson - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Are Video Games Art?Aaron Smuts - 2005 - Contemporary Aesthetics 3.
Actual Art, Possible Art, and Art's Definition.Gregory Currie - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (3):235-241.
Art and Art Criticism: A Definition of Art.Francis Dauer - 1990 - Metaphilosophy 21 (1-2):111-132.
First Art and Art’s Definition.Stephen Davies - 1997 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):19-34.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
160 ( #62,915 of 2,432,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #39,260 of 2,432,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes