Authors
M. Adeel
Kutztown University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Scott Soames argues that interpreted in the light of Quine's holistic verificationism, Quine's thesis of underdetermination leads to a contradiction. It is contended here that if we pay proper attention to the evolution of Quine's thinking on the subject, particularly his criterion of theory individuation, Quine's thesis of underdetermination escapes Soames' charge of paradoxicality.
Keywords W.V. Quine  Underdetermination  Holism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2015
DOI 10.1086/680369
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Soames on Quine and Davidson. [REVIEW]Alex Byrne - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (3):439 - 449.
Duhem–Quine Virtue Epistemology.Abrol Fairweather - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):673-692.
Theory and Experiment in Molecular Population Genetics.Michael Robert Dietrich - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
Quine's Thesis of Referential Inscrutability.I. Dean Beebe - 1988 - Dissertation, Boston University
Quine's Notion of Fact of the Matter.Eve Gaudet - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (2):181–193.
The Indeterminacy of Translation and the Inscrutability of Reference.Scott Soames - 1999 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):321-370.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-03-20

Total views
370 ( #26,998 of 2,499,413 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #46,462 of 2,499,413 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes