Classical Quarterly 16 (02):193- (1966)
To be satisfactory, a scholarly interpretation of a Greek tragedy must enable the present-day reader to see the play, so far as is possible, through the eyes of the fifth-century audience. If it does not, if it merely substitutes the predilections of a particular scholar for those of the reader, it is useless, and indeed worse than useless; for the reader unassisted by the interpretation of others may well examine the play critically for himself, while the reader with an interpretation at his elbow is likely to make every effort to fit the ideas of the tragedian into the schema provided for him. Certainly, more and more interpretations are of the kind which assist the reader; but a significant number even of the most recent throw more darkness than light on their subject by refusing to acknowledge the whole context of value and belief in terms of which the tragedians wrote, and the audience watched, these dramas. The result of such misinterpretation is frequently, as in the case of the two I shall discuss here, to present for our admiration a more high-minded and uplifting drama than the one which Euripides wrote; but our concern is presumably not to achieve this end, but to understand Euripides and his audience
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Euripides and Aeschylus: The Case of the Hekabe.William G. Thalmann - 1993 - Classical Antiquity 12 (1):126-159.
Similar books and articles
Note on Euripides, Hercules Furens, 773–780.J. T. Sheppard - 1915 - The Classical Review 29 (03):68-69.
Seneca's Hercules Furens and Hercules Oetaeus (Otto Edert), Kiel, 1909 Seneca's Hercules Furens and Hercules Oetaeus (Otto Edert), Kiel, 1909.D. G. A. - 1913 - The Classical Review 27 (01):31-32.
Theodorus Bernardus Bonifacius Siemers: Seneca's Hercules Furens En Euripides' Heracles [With Summary in English.] Pp. 111. Heerlen, Holland: Limburgsch Dagblad, 1951. Paper. [REVIEW]W. R. Smyth - 1953 - The Classical Review 3 (3-4):206-.
Euripides' Hippolytus and Hecuba David Kovacs: The Heroic Muse: Studies in the Hippolytus and Hecuba of Euripides. (AJP Monographs in Classical Philology, 2.) Pp. Xiv+161. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987. $19.95. [REVIEW]S. Ireland - 1988 - The Classical Review 38 (02):208-209.
Hadley's Edition of the Hecuba The Hecuba of Euripides, with Introduction and Notes, by W. S. Hadley, M.A. Cambridge, University Press. 2s. 6d. [REVIEW]E. B. England - 1895 - The Classical Review 9 (03):170-172.
Seneca's Hercules John G. Fitch (Ed.): Seneca's Hercules Furens. A Critical Text with Introduction and Commentary. (Cornell Studies in Classical Philology, 45.) Pp. 489. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1987. $49.50. [REVIEW]Roland Mayer - 1990 - The Classical Review 40 (02):272-274.
Hercules Furens and Prometheus Vinctus.H. G. Mullens - 1939 - The Classical Review 53 (5-6):165-166.
Versions of Euripides Four Dramas of Euripides (Hecuba, Heracles, Andromache, Orestes) Translated Into English Verse by H. O. Meredith. Pp. 253. London: Allen and Unwin, 1937. Clothes. 6d. Euripides' Ion Translated with Notes by H. D. Pp. Xi + 132. London: Chatto and Windus, 1937. Cloth, 6s. [REVIEW]F. R. Earp - 1937 - The Classical Review 51 (05):171-172.
The Tears of Euripides Charles Segal: Euripides and the Poetics of Sorrow: Art, Gender, and Commemoration in Alcestis, Hippolytus, and Hecuba. Pp. Xiii+313, Frontispiece. Durham, London: Duke University Press, 1993. £42.75. [REVIEW]E. M. Craik - 1995 - The Classical Review 45 (01):10-11.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads4 ( #625,373 of 2,146,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,123 of 2,146,203 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.