Informal Logic 13 (2) (1991)

Abstract
A critical study of McPeck's recent book, in which he strengthens and develops his arguments against teaching critical thinking (CT). Accepting McPeck's basic claim that there is no unitary skill of reasoning or thinking, I argue that his strictures on CT courses or programs do not follow. I set out what I consider the proper justification that programs in CT have to meet, and argue both that McPeck demands much more than is required, and also that it is plausible that this deflated justification can be met. Specitically, I argue that it is reasonable to expect transfer of learning for basic logical skills. Additional topics covered include: the relation ofliberal education to critical thinking, argument analysis, testing for CT, and the value of conceptual or linguistic analysis
Keywords Critical thinking (CT), liberal education, transfer (transferability, transfer of learning), argument analysis, informal logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,909
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Identifying Implicit Assumptions.Robert H. Ennis - 1982 - Synthese 51 (1):61 - 86.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
59 ( #167,246 of 2,403,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #77,179 of 2,403,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes