Pragmatic encroachment, methods and contextualism

Analysis 72 (3):526-534 (2012)
Abstract
Defence of conditions to withdraw an assertion that require evidence or epistemic reasons that the assertion is not true or warranted. (Adler, J. 2006. Withdrawal and contextualism. Analysis 66: 280–85) The defence replies to the claim that better methods justify withdrawal without meeting that requirement and without pragmatic encroachment.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/ans060
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,425
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Withdrawal and Contextualism.Jonathan E. Adler - 2006 - Analysis 66 (4):280–285.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Applying Pragmatics to Epistemology.Kent Bach - 2008 - Philosophical Issues 18 (1):68-88.
Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment1.Jacob Ross & Mark Schroeder - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):259-288.
Pragmatic Encroachment, Stakes, and Religious Knowledge.Aaron Rizzieri - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):217-229.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-06-08

Total downloads
174 ( #32,297 of 2,267,095 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #210,707 of 2,267,095 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature