Pragmatic encroachment, methods and contextualism

Analysis 72 (3):526-534 (2012)
Abstract
Defence of conditions to withdraw an assertion that require evidence or epistemic reasons that the assertion is not true or warranted. (Adler, J. 2006. Withdrawal and contextualism. Analysis 66: 280–85) The defence replies to the claim that better methods justify withdrawal without meeting that requirement and without pragmatic encroachment.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/ans060
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Withdrawal and Contextualism.Jonathan E. Adler - 2006 - Analysis 66 (4):280–285.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Applying Pragmatics to Epistemology.Kent Bach - 2008 - Philosophical Issues 18 (1):68-88.
Belief, Credence, and Pragmatic Encroachment1.Jacob Ross & Mark Schroeder - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):259-288.
Pragmatic Encroachment, Stakes, and Religious Knowledge.Aaron Rizzieri - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):217-229.
Knowledge in an Uncertain World.Jeremy Fantl - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP index
2012-06-08

Total downloads
171 ( #27,726 of 2,191,825 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #288,547 of 2,191,825 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature