Historical Causes

Philosophy 5 (18):216- (1930)

Abstract
The question in philosophy of whether History is a Science is rather like the question in Politics of the expediency of a Channel Tunnel: it is one which provides a perennial subject for debate, there is no indication that it will ever be decided one way or the other, and it does not after all seem to matter much even if it never is decided; we can get along well enough by neglecting it altogether. One might argue indeed that the dispute is not much more than a matter of words, of the intension and extension of terms. It is evident that the method and aim of the historian differ widely from those of the physicist, and on the other hand resemble closely those of the geologist. Why trouble to go splitting hairs?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819100013279
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,236
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-10

Total views
4 ( #1,074,401 of 2,254,263 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #477,229 of 2,254,263 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature