Philosophy 6 (23):336 - 346 (1931)

Last year the B.B.C. arranged for certain eminent men to broadcast their Points of View to the public. The result was a most interesting series of talks; but for the sceptical philosopher the series was chiefly entertaining for its brilliantly illustrating the old tag: quot homines, tot sententiæ. One was struck not merely by the discrepancy of opinion, but by how each speaker was ‘true to type': the biologist, the physicist with a taste for spiritualism, the Christian Platonist, and the rest—each spoke his part and told of a world built according to his own particular measuring-rod
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819100032216
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,261
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Putnam and the God’s Eye Point of View.Michel Ghins - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):235-243.
A Point of View on Points of View.John Biro - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):3-12.
Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader.Robert Young (ed.) - 1981 - Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Is the General Point of View the Moral Point of View? [REVIEW]Charlotte Brown - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):197–203.
God's Point of View: A Reply to Mander.Yujin Nagasawa - 2003 - Heythrop Journal 44 (1):60–63.


Added to PP index

Total views
9 ( #928,679 of 2,455,870 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,201 of 2,455,870 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes