Peter Auriol on the Intuitive Cognition of Nonexistents. Revisiting the Charge of Skepticism in Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham

Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 5 (1):151-180 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper looks at the critical reception of two central claims of Peter Auriol’s theory of cognition: the claim that the objects of cognition have an apparent or objective being that resists reduction to the real being of objects, and the claim that there may be natural intuitive cognitions of nonexistent objects. These claims earned Auriol the criticism of his fellow Franciscans, Walter Chatton and Adam Wodeham. According to them, the theory of apparent being was what had led Auriol to allow for intuitive cognitions of nonexistents, but the intuitive cognition of nonexistents, at its turn, led to scepticism. Modern commentators have offered similar readings of Auriol, but this paper argues, first, that the apparent being provides no special reason to think there could be intuitions of nonexistent objects, and second, that despite his idiosyncratic account of intuition, Auriol was no more vulnerable to scepticism than his critics.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peter John Olivi and Peter Auriol on Conceptual Thought.Han Thomas Adriaenssen - 2014 - Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 2 (1):67-97.
The Early Reception of Peter Auriol at Oxford.Rondo Keele - 2015 - Recherches de Theologie Et Philosophie Medievales 82:301-361.
Perception and Objective Being: Peter Auriol on Perceptual Acts and their Objects.Lukáš Lička - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):49-76.
Intuitive cognition and inner experience in wodeham, Adam. 2.Me Reina - 1986 - Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 41 (2):19-49.


Added to PP

355 (#52,921)

6 months
84 (#45,467)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Han Thomas Adriaenssen
University of Groningen

Citations of this work

Medieval skepticism.Charles Bolyard - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Peter auriol.Russell L. Friedman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Adam de wodeham.John T. Slotemaker - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references