Mind and Cosmos. Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False by M. D. Aeschliman

The Chesterton Review 39 (3/4):305-309 (2013)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/chesterton2013393/4149
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 42,993
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Michael Aeschliman on Scientism Vs. Sapentia.Michael D. Aeschliman - 2009 - The Chesterton Review 35 (1/2):248-257.
Mind and Cosmos.Thomas Nagel - 2012 - Oxford Up.
Getting Scientific with Religion:A Darwinian Solution... Or Not?Barak Morgan - 2010 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (3-4):192-230.
A Note About Martin Gardner.Michael Aeschliman - 1990 - The Chesterton Review 16 (2):113-113.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #191,039 of 2,259,488 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #667,524 of 2,259,488 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature