Philosophy of Science 47 (1):82-99 (1980)
Basic research or fundamental research is distinct from both pure and applied research, in that it is pure research with expected useful results. The existence of basic or fundamental research is problematic, at least for both inductivists and instrumentalists, but also for Popper. Assuming scientific research to be the search for explanatory conjectures and for refutations, and assuming technology to be the search of conjectures and some corroborations, we can easily place basic or fundamental research between science and technology as a part of their overlap. As a bonus, the present view of basic or fundamental research as an overlap explains the specific hardship basic research workers encounter
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Demarcating Technology From Science: Problems and Problem Solving in Technology.Aristidis Arageorgis & Aristides Baltas - 1989 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 20 (2):212-229.
Similar books and articles
Theories for Use: On the Bearing of Basic Science on Practical Problems.Martin Carrier - 2010 - In M. Dorato M. Suàrez (ed.), Epsa Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Springer. pp. 23--33.
Is the Use of Sentient Animals in Basic Research Justifiable?Ray Greek & Jean Greek - 2010 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5 (1):14.
Reflections on Basic Science.Joram Piatigorsky - 2010 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):571-583.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads27 ( #185,467 of 2,153,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,963 of 2,153,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?