Philosophy 84 (4):549-570 (2009)

Reshef Agam-Segal
Virginia Military Institute
I explore the idea of language reaching its limits by distinguishing two kinds of limits language may have: The first are “Boundaries” which lie on the edges of language, and distinguish what makes sense from what does not. These, I claim, are suitable in making theoretical generalizations. The second are “Contours,” which lie within language, and allow for contrasting and comparing meanings and shades of meanings that we capture in language. These are more suitable for characterizations of particulars, and for literary use. I claim that failure to draw this distinction is responsible for confusions in Sabina Lovibond’s and Richard Rorty’s views of moral thought and language.
Keywords limits of language / Nonsense  Cora Diamond  Meta-Philosophy  linguistic conservatism  Richard Rorty  Sabina Lovibond
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819109990118
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,290
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
57 ( #201,437 of 2,519,272 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #407,861 of 2,519,272 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes