Abstract and Introduction. This essay is an attempt to dispense with the negative aspects of Romanticism and examine whatever positive it has to offer--in the light of ideas scattered through diverse writings of Ernest Gellner
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ernest Gellner and Contemporary Social Thought.Siniša Malešević & Mark Haugaard (eds.) - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
Book Review:Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences. Ernest Gellner, I. C. Jarvie, Joseph Agassiz; Contemporary Thought and Politics. Ernest Gellner, I. C. Jarvie, Joseph Agassiz. [REVIEW]Donald Meiklejohn - 1975 - Ethics 85 (2):179-.
Ernest Gellner's Use of the Social Sciences in Philosophy.Stefan Schubert - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences (1):0048393112444319.
Words and Things: An Examination of, and an Attack on, Linguistic Philosophy.Ernest Gellner - 1979 - Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Explaining Monoculturalism: Beyond Gellner's Theory of Nationalism.Damian Tambini - 1996 - Critical Review 10 (2):251-270.
Book Reviews : Contemporary Thought and Politics. Ernest Gellner. Edited with a Preface by I. C. Jarvie and Joseph Agassi. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, I974. Pp. 207. 3.95. [REVIEW]P. D. Shaw - 1975 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 5 (2):229-233.
Aesthetic Licence: Foucault's Modernism and Kant's Post-Modernism.Salim Kemal - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (3):281 – 303.
Added to index2011-08-07
Total downloads34 ( #147,765 of 2,153,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,963 of 2,153,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?