- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
How ignoring repeatability leads to magic
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (4):528-586 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology.Dane Scott - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
Magic without magic: Meaning of quantum brain dynamics.Marj Jibu & Kunio Yasue - 1997 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 18 (2-3):205-228.
Where the magic breaks down: Boundaries and the “focus-of-attention” in schizophrenia.Robert D. Oades & Boutheina Jemel - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):135-136.
Plotinus and Magic.Wendy Elgersma Helleman - 2010 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):114-146.
Tensed sentences and free repeatability.Stephen E. Braude - 1973 - Philosophical Review 82 (2):188-214.
The vital but dangerous art of ignoring: Selective attention and self-deception.Annette C. Baier - 1996 - In Roger T. Ames & Wimal Dissanayake (eds.), Self and Deception: A Cross-Cultural Philosophical Enquiry. Albany: SUNY Press.
Explaining the "magic" of consciousness.Daniel C. Dennett - 2003 - Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology 1 (1):7-19.
Earthbodies: rediscovering our planetary senses.Glen A. Mazis - 2002 - Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
54 (#289,243)
6 months
4 (#790,687)
2009-01-28
Downloads
54 (#289,243)
6 months
4 (#790,687)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?: Demarcation revisited.Robert T. Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
Can’t philosophers tell the difference between science and religion?: Demarcation revisited.Robert T. Pennock - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):177-206.
References found in this work
Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe.
Wittgenstein on rules and private language: an elementary exposition.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The logical basis of metaphysics.Michael Dummett - 1991 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo