Animal suffering as a challenge to theistic theodicy

International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 78 (4-5):498-510 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the current debate on theodicy, the problem of animal suffering is becoming increasingly relevant, as demonstrated by some recent books devoted to this topic. Such a problem is particularly challenging for a theistic theodicy, as its traditional arguments do not seem able to deal with it. In the first instance, the article aims to provide a brief overview of the main arguments sustained by theists regarding animal suffering, and secondly to provide an evaluation of such arguments which might be useful for further research on this topic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,484

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-15

Downloads
62 (#283,547)

6 months
14 (#176,795)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Do we Need a Plant Theodicy?Lloyd Strickland - 2021 - Scientia et Fides 9 (2):221-246.

Add more citations

References found in this work

.R. G. Swinburne - 1989 - Cambridge University Press.
The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.William L. Rowe - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (4):335 - 341.
The Problem of Evil.Peter van Inwagen - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):696-698.
God, Freedom, and Evil.Alvin Plantinga - 1978 - Religious Studies 14 (3):407-409.
The Miracle of Theism.John Leslie Mackie - 1982 - Philosophy 58 (225):414-416.

View all 19 references / Add more references