Chinese and Westerners Respond Differently to the Trolley Dilemmas

Journal of Cognition and Culture 12 (3-4):195-201 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A set of moral problems known as The Trolley Dilemmas was presented to 3000 randomly selected inhabitants of the USA, Russia and China. It is shown that Chinese are significantly less prone to support utility-maximizing alternatives, as compared to the US and Russian respondents. A number of possible explanations, as well as methodological issues pertaining to the field of surveying moral judgment and moral disagreement, are discussed.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Solving the Trolley Problem.Joshua D. Greene - 2016 - In Wesley Buckwalter & Justin Sytsma (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 173–189.
Hit by the Virtual Trolley: When is Experimental Ethics Unethical?Jon Rueda - 2022 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):7-27.
The Trolley Problem.Hallvard Lillehammer (ed.) - 2022 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Medical ethics and the trolley problem.Gabriel Andrade - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine 12.
Three Shortcomings of the Trolley Method of Moral Philosophy.Guy Crain - 2023 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 26 (2).
Belief Updating in Moral Dilemmas.Zachary Horne, Derek Powell & Joseph Spino - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (4):705-714.


Added to PP

295 (#73,667)

6 months
36 (#116,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Torbjörn Tännsjö
Stockholm University
Henrik Ahlenius
Stockholm University