Censoring Online Bullshit

Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Online bullshit consists in online claims offered by speakers misrepresenting themselves as being concerned about the truth or falsity of what they’re saying. I’ll argue that if some practice is epistemically detrimental, we have pro tanto reason to censor it; a practice of OB is epistemically detrimental; and we thereby have pro tanto reason to censor such a practice. After having considered, and rejected, the three most promising arguments to the effect that is either false, or the reasons involved tend to be defeated, I defend, and finally conclude by inferring.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,925

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Aspirational theism and gratuitous suffering.Jimmy Alfonso Licon - 2021 - Religious Studies 57 (2):287-300.
Rethinking Bullshit Receptivity.Jonathan Wilson - 2024 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 15 (4):1445-1460.
Rethinking Bullshit Receptivity.Jonathan Wilson - 2023 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology (4).
Hate Speech and Self-Restraint.Simon Thompson - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (3):657-671.
Does justice require genetic enhancements?N. Holtug - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):137-143.
Ignoring the Good and Deontological Rationality.Natalie Hormaz Vania - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park
Bullshit, Truth, and Reason.Eldar Sarajlic - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (3):865-879.
Reasons as explanations.John Brunero - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):805-824.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-19

Downloads
17 (#1,251,850)

6 months
17 (#181,050)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij
Birkbeck, University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references