Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (2):176-183 (2013)

Arif Ahmed
Cambridge University
Evolutionary game theory is ethically neutral: its assumption of ‘rationality’ has nothing to do with selfishness but is in fact entirely compatible with altruism. If altruism has an evolutionary explanation then this fact is of no theological relevance: in particular it is not any sort of evidence of a divine plan etc.
Keywords Game theory  Evolutionary Game Theory  God
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0953946812473023
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,291
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reciprocity and the Social Contract.Ken Binmore - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (1):5-35.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Relevance of Decision Theory to Ethical Theory.Jan Narveson - 2010 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 13 (5):497-520.
Beyond Rationality: Rigor Without Mortis in Game Theory.Andrew M. Colman - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):180-192.
Facts About Natural Values.Robert Elliot - 1996 - Environmental Values 5 (3):221 - 234.
Why Not Go All the Way.Richard Schuster - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):173-174.
Independent Choices and the Interpretation of IF Logic.Theo M. V. Janssen - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (3):367-387.
A Meta-Ethical Critique of Care Ethics.Abraham Rudnick - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):505-517.


Added to PP index

Total views
160 ( #67,394 of 2,456,078 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #303,388 of 2,456,078 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes