On neat reducts of algebras of logic

Studia Logica 68 (2):229-262 (2001)
SC , CA , QA and QEA stand for the classes of Pinter's substitution algebras, Tarski's cylindric algebras, Halmos' quasipolyadic algebras, and quasipolyadic equality algebras of dimension , respectively. Generalizing a result of Németi on cylindric algebras, we show that for K {SC, CA, QA, QEA} and ordinals , the class Nr K of -dimensional neat reducts of -dimensional K algebras, though closed under taking homomorphic images and products, is not closed under forming subalgebras (i.e. is not a variety) if and only if > 1.From this it easily follows that for 1 , the operation of forming -neat reducts of algebras in K does not commute with forming subalgebras, a notion to be made precise
Keywords Philosophy   Logic   Mathematical Logic and Foundations   Computational Linguistics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1012447223176
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,126
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Algebraic Logic, Where Does It Stand Today?Sayed Ahmed Tarek - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (4):465-516.
Polyadic and Cylindric Algebras of Sentences.Mohamed Amer & Tarek Sayed Ahmed - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (5):444-449.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

23 ( #219,657 of 2,171,818 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,818 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums