Philosophy 80 (4):513-529 (2005)

If Wittgenstein's later account of language is applied to music, what seems to follow is a version of musical formalism. This is to say that the meaning of music is constituted by the rules of a given system of music, and the understanding of music is the ability to follow these rules. I argue that, while this view may seem unattractive at the outset, Wittgenstein actually held this view. Moreover, his later notion of a rule gives us resources to answer some of the traditional criticisms directed against formalism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0031819105000446
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,577
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Contemporary Finnish Aesthetics.Arto Haapala - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (1):1-10.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
66 ( #177,154 of 2,533,585 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #199,858 of 2,533,585 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes