Don't feed the trolls: Straw men and iron men

Abstract

The straw man fallacy consists in inappropriately constructing or selecting weak versions of the opposition's arguments. We will survey the three forms of straw men recognized in the literature, the straw, weak, and hollow man. We will then make the case that there are examples of inappropriately reconstructing stronger versions of the opposition's arguments. Such cases we will call iron man fallacies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.
Two Forms of the Straw Man.Robert Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):345-352.
The Non-Significance of Straw Man Arguments.Niels G. Waller & Wesley O. Johnson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):226-227.
Tortuous Dualism.Michael Levin - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (6):313-22.
A Straw Man's Neogenome.Oscar Vilarroya - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):380 - 381.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-04-02

Downloads
36 (#321,387)

6 months
2 (#276,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?