Developing Group-Deliberative Virtues

Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):409-424 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, the authors argue for two main claims: first, that the epistemic results of group deliberation can be superior to those of individual inquiry; and, second, that successful deliberative groups depend on individuals exhibiting deliberative virtues. The development of these group-deliberative virtues, the authors argue, is important not only for epistemic purposes but political purposes, as democracies require the virtuous deliberation of their citizens. Deliberative virtues contribute to the deliberative synergy of the group, not only in terms of improving the quality of the group's present decisions, but also improving the background conditions for continued group deliberation. The authors sketch a preliminary schedule of these group-deliberative virtues modelled on Aristotle's conception of virtue as the mean between two extreme vices. The virtues discussed in this article include deliberative wit, friendliness, empathy, charity, temperance, courage, sincerity, and humility

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can We Talk It Out?Miguel Egler - forthcoming - Episteme:1-19.
Deliberative Democracy.Thomas Christiano & Sameer Bajaj - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert‐Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee & David Coady (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Chichester, UK: Wiley. pp. 383–396.
Group-deliberative virtues and legal epistemology.Amalia Amaya - 2020 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Carmen Vázquez (eds.), Evidential Legal Reasoning: Crossing Civil Law and Common Law Traditions. Cambridge University Press.
Group-deliberative virtues and legal epistemology.Amalia Amaya - 2020 - In Jordi Ferrer Beltrán & Carmen Vázquez Rojas (eds.), Evidential legal reasoning: crossing civil law and common law traditions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-10

Downloads
152 (#128,179)

6 months
10 (#308,797)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Scott Aikin
Vanderbilt University
J. Caleb Clanton
Vanderbilt University

Citations of this work

The Vices of Argument.Andrew Aberdein - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):413-422.
Epistemic Virtues in Business.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 113 (4):583-595.
Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.Mark Battersby (ed.) - 2018 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references