Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men
Argumentation 25 (1):87-105 (2011)
Abstract
Three forms of the straw man fallacy are posed: the straw, weak, and hollow man. Additionally, there can be non-fallacious cases of any of these species of straw man argumentsAuthor Profiles
DOI
10.1007/s10503-010-9199-y
My notes
Similar books and articles
How often do we (philosophy professors) commit the straw man fallacy?Brian Ribeiro - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (1):27-38.
Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation.Marcin Lewiński - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):469-497.
“Re”-Constructing Philosophical Arguments: Getting a Grip on Thomistic Straw Men.Stephen Laumakis - 2005 - Modern Schoolman 82 (4):245-251.
On Nature, Human Identity, and Straw Men.Nathan Kowalsky - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (4):443-444.
Real men.Hugh LaFollette - 1992 - In Larry May & Robert Strikwerda (eds.), Masculinity. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 59--74.
Straw men with broken legs: a response to Per Sundstrom.P. Singer - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (2):89-90.
Balancing principles, QALYs and the straw men of resource allocation.John McMillan & Tony Hope - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):48 – 50.
Burning straw men sheds little light: A reply to Whiting and Kelly.Mark Wilkinson - 1997 - Acta Biotheoretica 45 (1):17-27.
Conversing with straw men while ignoring dictators: A reply to Roger Ames.Jack Donnelly - 1997 - Ethics and International Affairs 11:207–213.
Do Don juans have better genes than family men?Alice H. Eagly - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):601-602.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-11-17
Downloads
112 (#112,864)
6 months
2 (#298,443)
2010-11-17
Downloads
112 (#112,864)
6 months
2 (#298,443)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life.Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri & Massimo Pigliucci - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (4):10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1.
Fooling the Victim: Of Straw Men and Those Who Fall for Them.Katharina Stevens - 2021 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 54 (2):109-127.
The Linguistic Formulation of Fallacies Matters: The Case of Causal Connectives.Jennifer Schumann, Sandrine Zufferey & Steve Oswald - 2020 - Argumentation 35 (3):361-388.
Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation.Marcin Lewiński - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):469-497.
Argumentative Polylogues: Beyond Dialectical Understanding of Fallacies.Marcin Lewiński - 2014 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1):193-218.
References found in this work
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.Douglas Neil Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1995 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.
Logic and Conversation.H. P. Grice - 1975 - In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), The Logic of Grammar. Encino, CA: pp. 64-75.
The law of group polarization.Cass R. Sunstein - 2002 - Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):175–195.
