Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):16-18 (2007)
The question of reductionism is an obstacle to unification. Many behavioral scientists who study the more complex or higher mental functions avoid regarding them as selected by motivation. Game-theoretic models in which complex processes grow from the strategic interaction of elementary reward-seeking processes can overcome the mechanical feel of earlier reward-based models. Three examples are briefly described. (Published Online April 27 2007).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mental Models in Conditional Reasoning and Working Memory.Pierre Barrouillet & Jean-Francois Lecas - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (4):289 – 302.
Mating Strategies as Game Theory: Changing Rules?Linda Mealey - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):613-613.
RED: ADHD Under the “Micro-Scope” of the Rat Model.Katya Rubia - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (3):439-440.
The Roles of Stories in Applying Game Theory.Till Grüne‐Yanoff & Paul Schweinzer - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2):131-146.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #77,532 of 2,171,705 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #173,816 of 2,171,705 )
How can I increase my downloads?