Science in Context 32 (4):361-380 (2019)

Abstract
ArgumentIn this paper we comparatively explore three claims concerning the disciplinary character of economics by means of citation analysis. The three claims under study are: economics exhibits strong forms of institutional stratification and, as a byproduct, a rather pronounced internal hierarchy; economists strongly conform to institutional incentives; and modern mainstream economics is a largely self-referential intellectual project mostly inaccessible to disciplinary or paradigmatic outsiders. The validity of these claims is assessed by means of an interdisciplinary comparison of citation patterns aiming to identify peculiar characteristics of economic discourse. In doing so, we emphasize that citation data can always be interpreted in different ways, thereby focusing on the contrast between a “cognitive” and an “evaluative” approach towards citation data.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0269889720000022
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour.Henri Tajfel - 1974 - Social Science Information 13 (2):65-93.
Evidence of a Harvard and Chicago Matthew Effect.Marshall H. Medoff - 2006 - Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (4):485-506.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Probe Into Causes of Non-Citation Based on Survey Data.Zewen Hu & Yishan Wu - 2018 - Social Science Information 57 (1):139-151.
Die Bedeutung der Zitatenanalyse Für Die Wissenschaftsforschung.Wolfgang G. Stock - 1985 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 16 (2):304-314.
Testing Bottom-Up Models of Complex Citation Networks.Mark A. Bedau - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (5):1131-1143.
Disentangling Gold Open Access.Daniel Torres-Salinas, Nicolas Robinson-García & Henk F. Moed - 2019 - In Wolfgang Glänzel, Henk F. Moed, Ulrich Schmoch & Mike Thelwall (eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Verlag. pp. 129-144.
Aberration of the Citation.Khaled Moustafa - 2016 - Accountability in Research 23 (4):230.
Understanding Belief Using Citation Networks.Steven A. Greenberg - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (2):389-393.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-06

Total views
5 ( #1,203,578 of 2,507,001 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,781 of 2,507,001 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes