Implementation of Japan’s First Clinical Research Regulatory Law: Background, Overview, and Challenges
HEC Forum 31 (4):283-294 (2019)
Abstract
In April 2018, Japan’s first law regulating clinical research went into effect. The law aimed to strengthen regulations on research integrity and conflicts of interest, which had been limited under existing administrative guidelines; the law also provided stipulations for legal penalties. The scope of the new regulations, however, is limited entirely to studies that evaluate unapproved drugs or the off-label use of approved drugs, and those that receive funding from companies. On the other hand, the law’s application brings numerous complications, including the establishment of new review committees, troublesome procedures for transitioning studies that are currently underway, and ambiguities about the scope of what constitutes best efforts. Thus, the change has led to substantial strain and confusion in the field. This paper offers an overview of the law and its background, and discusses its future prospects from the practical standpoint of managing ethics committees and providing research ethics support in the field.My notes
Similar books and articles
Barriers and challenges in clinical ethics consultations: The experiences of nine clinical ethics committees: Country reports.Reidar Pedersen - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (8):460-469.
Ordinary Citizens? Expectations for Regenerative Medicine and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Researches in Japan.Yoshiyuki Takimoto, Eisuke Nakazawa, Atsushi Tsuchiya & Akabayashi Akira - 2017 - Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 8 (5).
What enables ethically conducted clinical research in hospitals? Views of the administrative staff.Sanna-Maria Nurmi, Mari Kangasniemi, Arja Halkoaho & Anna-Maija Pietilä - 2016 - Clinical Ethics 11 (4):166-175.
Barriers to the Ethics Committee in India: Ethical and Quality Issues.Madhuri Patel, Kannan Sridharan & Jayesh Patel - 2016 - Asian Bioethics Review 8 (2):81-93.
Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary.Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.) - 2003 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Questionable Research Practices Compel Subjects to Join Studies.David Resnik - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 30 (29).
Clinical ethics revisited.Peter Singer, Edmund Pellegrino & Mark Siegler - 2001 - BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-8.
Clinical ethics revisited.D. Pellegrino Edmund, A. Singer Peter & Siegler Mark - 2001 - BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1.
Regulations on Genome Editing of Human Embryos in Japan: Our Moral Moratorium.Eisuke Nakazawa, Keiichiro Yamamoto, Aru Akabayashi & Akira Akabayashi - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (3):360-365.
Review of national research ethics regulations and guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab countries. [REVIEW]Ghiath Alahmad, Mohammad Al-Jumah & Kris Dierickx - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):34-.
Bridging Philosophical and Practical Implications of Incidental Findings in Brain Research.Judy Illes & Vivian Nora Chin - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):298-304.
An eight-year follow-up national study of medical school and general hospital ethics committees in Japan.Akira Akabayashi, Brian T. Slingsby, Noriko Nagao, Ichiro Kai & Hajime Sato - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-8.
Ethics committees for "high tech" innovations in japan.Rihito Kimura - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):457-464.
A Clinical Trials Manual From the Duke Clinical Research Institute: Lessons From a Horse Named Jim.Margaret B. Liu - 2010 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi.Randy G. Mungwira, Wongani Nyangulu, James Misiri, Steven Iphani, Ruby Ng’ong’ola, Chawanangwa M. Chirambo, Francis Masiye & Joseph Mfutso-Bengo - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-7.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-07-31
Downloads
2 (#1,402,477)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
2019-07-31
Downloads
2 (#1,402,477)
6 months
1 (#451,971)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
An eight-year follow-up national study of medical school and general hospital ethics committees in Japan.Akira Akabayashi, Brian T. Slingsby, Noriko Nagao, Ichiro Kai & Hajime Sato - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-8.
Administrative Legislation in Japan: Guidelines on Scientific and Ethical Standards.Brian T. Slingsby, Noriko Nagao & Akira Akabayashi - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (3):245-253.
Conflict of interest: a Japanese perspective.Akira Akabayashi, Brian Taylor Slingsby & Yoshiyuki Takimoto - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (3):277-280.
A Five Year Follow-Up National Study of Ethics Committees in Medical Organizations in Japan.Akira Akabayashi, Brian Taylor Slingsby, Noriko Nagao, Ichiro Kai & Hajime Sato - 2008 - HEC Forum 20 (1):49-60.
Conflict of Interest: A Japanese Perspective.Akira Akabayashi, Brian Slingsby & Yoshiyuki Takimoto - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (3):277-280.