Solitary death and new lifestyles during and after COVID-19: wearable devices and public health ethics
BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-10 (2021)
Abstract
BackgroundSolitary death has recently become recognized as a social issue in Japan. The social isolation of older people leads to death without dignity. With the outbreak of COVID-19, efforts to eliminate solitary death need to be adjusted in line with changes in lifestyle and accompanying changes in social structure. Health monitoring services that utilize wearable devices may contribute to this end. Our goals are to outline how wearable devices might be used to detect emergency situations involving solitary older people and swiftly connect them with medical treatment, to reduce the frequency of deaths that remain undiscovered and to reduce social isolation by promoting social interaction. MethodsTheoretical and philosophical approaches were adopted to examine ethical issues surrounding the application of wearable devices and cloud-based information processing systems to prevent solitary death in the world with/after COVID-19.Main body Technology cannot replace social connections; without social support necessary to foster understanding of the benefits of health management through wearable devices among older adults, such devices may remain unused, or not used properly. Maturity of the technology; systems face the difficult task of detecting and responding to a wide range of health conditions and life-threatening events in time to avert avoidable morbidity and mortality. Autonomy and personhood; promoting the voluntary use of wearable devices that are a part of larger efforts to connect isolated individuals to a community or social services might be effective. Legal force should be avoided if possible. There is some concern that landlords may require an older person to sign a contract agreeing to wear a device. The autonomy of solitary older people should be respected. Governance: policies must be developed to limit access to data from wearables and the purposes for which data can be used.ConclusionIf thoughtfully deployed under proper policy constraints, wearable devices offer a way to connect solitary older people to health services and could reduce cases of solitary death while respecting the personhood of the user.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1186/s12910-021-00657-9
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices.L. H. Segura Anaya, Abeer Alsadoon, N. Costadopoulos & P. W. C. Prasad - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):1-28.
COVID-19 and the selection problem in national cause-of-death statistics.B. I. B. Lindahl - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (2):1-5.
‘My Fitbit Thinks I Can Do Better!’ Do Health Promoting Wearable Technologies Support Personal Autonomy?John Owens & Alan Cribb - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (1):23-38.
COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death: disentangling facts and values.Maria Cristina Amoretti & Elisabetta Lalumera - 2021 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (1):1-4.
Oral Health Matters: The Ethics of Providing Oral Health During COVID-19.Nanette Elster & Kayhan Parsi - 2021 - HEC Forum 33 (1):157-164.
The Borg–eye and the We–I. The production of a collective living body through wearable computers.Nicola Liberati - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (1):39-49.
Health Equity and the Public Health Code of Ethics: Rebuilding Trust from the COVID-19 Pandemic.Georges C. Benjamin - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (3):8-10.
Postscript: COVID-19 and the Legal Determinants of Health.John Coggon & Lawrence O. Gostin - 2020 - Public Health Ethics 13 (1):48-49.
A Taxonomy of Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Wearable Robots: An Expert Perspective.Alexandra Kapeller, Heike Felzmann, Eduard Fosch-Villaronga & Ann-Marie Hughes - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3229-3247.
Ethics, public health and technology responses to COVID‐19.Seumas Miller & Marcus Smith - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (4):366-371.
Chinese Bioethicists Speak Out on Covid‐19, and Others Follow.Susan Gilbert - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (2).
COVID-19 Ethics—Looking Down the Muzzle.Grant Gillett - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (4):501-502.
Responding to Covid‐19: How to Navigate a Public Health Emergency Legally and Ethically.Lawrence O. Gostin, Eric A. Friedman & Sarah A. Wetter - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (2):8-12.
The COVID-19 containment in Vietnam: What are we doing?Toan Luu Duc Huynh - 2020 - Journal of Global Health 10 (1):010338.
Non-Epistemic Factors in Epidemiological Models. The Case of Mortality Data.M. Cristina Amoretti & Elisabetta Lalumera - 2021 - Mefisto 1 (5):65-78.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-07-11
Downloads
5 (#1,170,023)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2021-07-11
Downloads
5 (#1,170,023)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads