Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):385 - 396 (2004)
In a paper entitled “Revolution in Permanence”, published in the collection “Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems”, John Worrall (1995) severely criticised several aspects of Karl Popper’s work before commenting that “I have no doubt that, given suffi-cient motivation, a case could be constructed on the basis of such remarks that Popper had a more sophisticated version of theory production......” (p. 102). Part of Worrall’s criticism is directed at a “strawpopper”: in his “Darwinian Model” emphasising the similarities and differences between genetic mutation, variation in animal behaviour and the gestation of scientific theories, Popper (1975, 1981, 1994) never stated that tentative scientific conjec-tures “while more or less random, are not completely blind.” He was referring to variation in animal species behaviour, and about tentative scientific conjectures he said nothing, although common sense would indicate that presumably he regarded them as being less blind and less random. In Popper (1977, 1983), giving a summary of his “Darwinian Model”, he repaired this omission about tentative scientific conjectures by inserting the sentence “On a level of World 3 theory formation they are of the character of planned gropings into the unknown.” Recent developments in the field of genetics (see for example Raff (1996), Lewis (1999), Korn (2002)) indicate that Popper’s intuitions were along the modern lines while Worrall’s intuitions are old fashioned. Therefore Popper’s “Darwinian Model” remains both viable and fruitful.
|Keywords||evolutionary epistemology natural selection orthogenesis|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
'Revolution in Permanence': Popper on Theory-Change in Science.John Worrall - 1995 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 39:75-102.
Biological Hierarchies, Their Birth, Death and Evolution by Natural Selection.Robert W. Korn - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (2):199-221.
Citations of this work BETA
The Logics of Discovery in Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303 - 319.
The Logics of Discovery in Popper’s Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303-319.
Similar books and articles
The Rejection of Evolutionary Epistemology: A Case For a Logic of Discovery.Casey Rufener - manuscript
Popper's Communitarianism.Jeff Kochan - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 272). Springer. pp. 287--303.
Elimination, Correction and Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology.James Blachowicz - 1995 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):5 – 17.
Fallibilism Democracy and the Market: The Meta-Theoretical Foundations of Popper's Political Philosophy.Calvin Hayes - 2001 - University Press of America.
Between Selz and Popper.Christina Erneling - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (2):311-318.
I. C. Jarvie: The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science 1935–1945,.reviewed John Wettersten - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (1):108-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads100 ( #49,099 of 2,153,472 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,759 of 2,153,472 )
How can I increase my downloads?