Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (3):403-431 (2009)
This paper sets forth a new theory of quantifiers and term connectives, called shadow theory , which should help simplify various semantic theories of natural language by greatly reducing the need of Montagovian proper names, type-shifting, and λ-conversion. According to shadow theory, conjunctive, disjunctive, and negative noun phrases such as John and Mary , John or Mary , and not both John and Mary , as well as determiner phrases such as every man , some woman , and the boys , are all of semantic type e and denote individual-like objects, called shadows — conjunctive , disjunctive , or negative shadows, such as John-and-Mary, John-or-Mary, and not-(John-and-Mary). There is no essential difference between quantification and denotation: quantification is nothing but denotation of shadows. Individuals and shadows constitute a Boolean structure. Formal language LSD (Language for Shadows with Distributivity), which takes compound terms to denote shadows, is investigated. Expansions and enrichments of LSD are also considered toward the end of the paper.
|Keywords||Conjunction Determiner phrases Disjunction Generalized quantifier theory Negation Shadows Quantification Quantifiers Term connectives|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.Jon Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
On the Expressive Power of Monotone Natural Language Quantifiers Over Finite Models.Jouko Väänänen & Dag Westerståhl - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (4):327-358.
Added to index2009-05-13
Total downloads85 ( #58,298 of 2,146,956 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,483 of 2,146,956 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.