Indefiniteness of mathematical objects

Philosophia Mathematica 8 (1):26--46 (2000)
Abstract
The view that mathematical objects are indefinite in nature is presented and defended, hi the first section, Field's argument for fictionalism, given in response to Benacerraf's problem of identification, is closely examined, and it is contended that platonists can solve the problem equally well if they take the view that mathematical objects are indefinite. In the second section, two general arguments against the intelligibility of objectual indefiniteness are shown erroneous, hi the final section, the view is compared to mathematical structuralism, and it is shown that a version of structuralism should be understood as embracing the same view
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/philmat/8.1.26
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,317
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vagueness in the World.Ken Akiba - 2004 - Noûs 38 (3):407–429.
Mathematical Existence.Penelope Maddy - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (3):351-376.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
82 ( #71,360 of 2,224,469 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #43,997 of 2,224,469 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature