Fully Unconscious and Prone to Habit: The Characteristics of Agency in the Structure and Agency Dialectic


Abstract
While the human agent must have the capacity for reflexivity, intentionality and consciousness, the same agent must also be affected by the social world in which she lives: herein lies the essence of the structure and agency dialectic. This paper argues that while some realists are in principle committed to a dialectical relationship between structure and agency, there is some dissonance between this commitment and the concepts of agency that they develop. I highlight the exclusion of the unconscious and habit from realist notions of agency and argue that this oversight serves to unbalance the dialectic between structure and agency thereby leading to the over-empowerment of agency. The concepts of agency developed by Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and Pierre Bourdieu are discussed in this paper. Archer's concept of agency is argued to focus exclusively on reflexivity whilst neglecting to include the unconscious and habit. Giddens is shown to develop a much improved concept of agency, which includes the unconscious, however, his rejection of the independent causal powers of structure and agency problematises his commitment to the dialectic. A much improved approach to theorising agency, developed within a critical realist framework, is offered drawing on Bourdieu's concept of habitus. The paper concludes with a discussion of gender, and considers how the unconscious and habit can help to better understand the myriad ways in which gender functions in society
Keywords habitus  reflexivity  agency  unconscious  structure
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/jtsb.12002
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,419
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Outline of a Theory of Practice.Pierre Bourdieu - 1981 - Human Studies 4 (3):273-278.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Critical Realism, Psychology and the Legacies of Psychoanalysis.David Pilgrim - 2017 - Journal of Critical Realism 16 (5):468-482.
Designing Social Action: The Impact of Reflexivity on Practice.Ana Caetano - 2019 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 49 (2):146-160.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Structure and Agency.Mike O'Donnell (ed.) - 2010 - Sage Publications.
Social Structure and Nursing Research.Stuart Nairn - 2009 - Nursing Philosophy 10 (3):191-202.
Hume and the Metaphysics of Agency.Joshua M. Wood - 2014 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (1):87-112.
"Agency" as a Red Herring in Social Theory.Steven Loyal & Barry Barnes - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (4):507-524.
Multiple Aspects of Agency.Shaun Gallagher - 2010 - New Ideas in Psychology.
The Return of the Subject?: Power, Reflexivity and Agency.David S. Stern - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (5):109-122.
The Phenomenology of Agency.Tim Bayne - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (1):182-202.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-03-01

Total views
74 ( #113,022 of 2,272,227 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #410,656 of 2,272,227 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature