Philosophy 40 (152):93 - 112 (1965)
In this paper I intend to do two things. The first is to discuss a method of doing philosophy, the method of ‘ordinary language’ philosophy, as it is commonly and misleadingly called. (Its other common title: ‘Oxford Philosophy’ is even more misleading, since the roots of the method lie in Cambridge, and many of the most flourishing branches are in the United States rather than England.)If it needs a name, perhaps the best is—adapting Popper to our purpose—‘piecemeal philosophical engineering’. Such a title would emphasise the attention to detail and the caution about conclusions that characterise the best of such work. The second aim of this paper is to apply the method thus discussed and defended to three questions connected with the concept of freedom. These problems arise out of three recent discussions of freedom—Thought and Action and Spinoza and the Idea of Freedom by Professor Hampshire, and Two Concepts of Liberty by Professor Berlin.
|Keywords||ordinary language freedom Liberty|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Language and Politics.[author unknown] - 1985 - New Vico Studies 3:219-220.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads37 ( #132,105 of 2,132,887 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #287,851 of 2,132,887 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.