The History of Sexual Anatomy and Self-Referential Philosophy of Science

Metaphilosophy 34 (3):229-249 (2003)
This essay is a case study of the self-destruction that occurs in the work of a social-constructionist historian of science who embraces a radical philosophy of science. It focuses on Thomas Laqueur's Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud in arguing that a history of science committed to the social construction of science and to the central theses of Kuhnian, Duhemian, and Quinean philosophy of science is incoherent through self-reference. Laqueur's text is examined in detail in order to make the main point; a similar phenomenon in the work of the feminist historian of science Evelyn Fox Keller is then briefly discussed
Keywords Evelyn Keller, Feminist Epistemology, History of Biology, Philosophy of Biology, Duhem, Social Constructionism, Thomas Kuhn, Thomas Laqueur, Quine
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9973.00272
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Gender, Objectivity, And Realism.Alan Soble - 1994 - The Monist 77 (4):509-530.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
1,207 ( #544 of 2,193,087 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #3,962 of 2,193,087 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature