Drinking in the last chance saloon: luck egalitarianism, alcohol consumption, and the organ transplant waiting list

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (2):325-338 (2016)

Authors
Andreas Albertsen
Aarhus University
Abstract
The scarcity of livers available for transplants forces tough choices upon us. Lives for those not receiving a transplant are likely to be short. One large group of potential recipients needs a new liver because of alcohol consumption, while others suffer for reasons unrelated to their own behaviour. Should the former group receive lower priority when scarce livers are allocated? This discussion connects with one of the most pertinent issues in contemporary political philosophy; the role of personal responsibility in distributive justice. One prominent theory of distributive justice, luck egalitarianism, assesses distributions as just if, and only if, people's relative positions reflect their exercises of responsibility. There is a principled luck egalitarian case for giving lower priority to those who are responsible for their need. Compared to the existing literature favouring such differentiation, luck egalitarianism provides a clearer rationale of fairness, acknowledges the need for individual assessments of responsibility, and requires initiatives both inside and outside of the allocation systems aimed at mitigating the influence from social circumstances. Furthermore, the concrete policies that luck egalitarians can recommend are neither too harsh on those who make imprudent choices nor excessively intrusive towards those whose exercises of responsibility are assessed.
Keywords luck egalitarianism  liver transplantation  health inequality  organ shortage  harshness objection  distributive justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-016-9684-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,524
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Rescuing Justice and Equality.G. A. Cohen (ed.) - 2008 - Harvard University Press.
Health, Luck, and Justice.Shlomi Segall - 2009 - Princeton University Press.

View all 72 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Problem Drinking in Australia.Emanuel Nicolas Cortes Simonet - 2014 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 19 (4):9.
The Incompleteness of Luck Egalitarianism.Ryan Long - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:87-96.
Commentary.Robert Gatter - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (3):377-378.
Luck Egalitarianism.Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen - 2015 - Bloomsbury Academic.
Luck Egalitarianism, Permissible Inequalities, and Moral Hazard.Gerald Lang - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (3):317-338.
Can Luck Egalitarianism Be Really Saved By Value Pluralism?Eugen Huzum - 2011 - Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philosophia 2.
Constitutive Luck.Andrew Latus - 2003 - Metaphilosophy 34 (4):460-475.
Luck Egalitarianism.Carl Knight - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (10):924-934.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-07

Total views
27 ( #305,909 of 2,248,785 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #311,084 of 2,248,785 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature