Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4):391-407 (2007)
AbstractOver the last decade, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been defined first as a concept whereby companies decide voluntarily to contribute to a better society and cleaner environment and, second, as a process by which companies manage their relationship␣with stakeholders (European Commission, 2001. Nowadays, CSR has become a priority issue on governments’ agendas. This has changed governments’ capacity to act and impact on social and environmental issues in their relationship with companies, but has also affected the framework in which CSR public policies are designed: governments are incorporating multi-stakeholder strategies. This article analyzes the CSR public policies in European advanced democracies, and more specifically the EU-15 countries, and provides explanatory keys on how governments have understood, designed and implemented their CSR public policies. The analysis has entailed the classification of CSR public policies taking into consideration the actor to which the governments’ policies were addressed. This approach to the analysis of CSR public policies in the EU-15 countries leads us to observe coinciding lines of action among the different countries analyzed, which has enabled us to propose a ‹four ideal’ typology model for governmental action on CSR in Europe: Partnership, Business in the Community, Sustainability, and Citizenship, and Agora. The main contribution of this article is to propose an analytical framework to analyze CSR public policies, which provide a perspective on the relationships between governments, businesses, and civil society stakeholders, and enable us to incorporate the analysis of CSR public policies into a broader approach focused on social governance.
Similar books and articles
The Changing Role of Governments in Corporate Social Responsibility: Drivers and Responses.Josep M. Lozano Laura Albareda - 2008 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 17 (4):347-363.
The Changing Role of Governments in Corporate Social Responsibility: Drivers and Responses.Laura Albareda, Josep M. Lozano, Antonio Tencati, Atle Midttun & Francesco Perrini - 2008 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 17 (4):347-363.
The Changing Role of Governments in Corporate Social Responsibility: Drivers and Responses.Laura Albareda, Josep M. Lozano, Antonio Tencati, Atle Midttun & Francesco Perrini - 2008 - Business Ethics: A European Review 17 (4):347-363.
From China Local Case to Study the Corporate Social Responsibility of the Multinational Corporations and the Functions of Host Governments.Bin Sheng, Bing-Qing Li & Bo Hu - 2009 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5:115-125.
Multinational Corporate Social Responsibility, Ethics, Interactions and Third World Governments: An Agenda for the 1990s. [REVIEW]Sita C. Amba-Rao - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (7):553 - 572.
Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: Some Issues Arising. [REVIEW]Jacquie L'Etang - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):111 - 123.
Public Relations Leadership in Corporate Social Responsibility.Suzanne Benn, Lindi Renier Todd & Jannet Pendleton - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3):403 - 423.
Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management: What Can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach Us in the Post-Enron Era?Joseph Heath & Wayne Norman - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (3):247-265.
The HIV/AIDS Crisis and Corporate Moral Responsibility in the Light of the Levinasian Notions of Proximity and the Third.Conceição Soares - 2007 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 16 (3):278–285.
Corporate Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Oversight.Jennifer Kuzma & Aliya Kuzhabekova - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (4):407-419.
Corporate Social Responsibility: Assessing the Economic Approach.Duane Windsor - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:180-185.
Institutional Conditions of Corporate Citizenship.Ronald Jeurissen - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):87-96.
Corporate Social Responsibility: A Catalyst for Progressive Change in the US Energy Sector?Diana Mangalagiu - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:212-217.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers.Mariarosaria Taddeo & Luciano Floridi - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (6):1575-1603.
Mandatory Non-Financial Disclosure and Its Influence on CSR: An International Comparison.Gregory Jackson, Julia Bartosch, Emma Avetisyan, Daniel Kinderman & Jette Steen Knudsen - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 162 (2):323-342.
Exploring the Relationship Between Business Model Innovation, Corporate Sustainability, and Organisational Values Within the Fashion Industry.Kerli Hvass, Wencke Gwozdz & Esben Pedersen - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 149 (2):267-284.
Institutional Environment, Managerial Attitudes and Environmental Sustainability Orientation of Small Firms.Banjo Roxas & Alan Coetzer - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (4):461-476.
When Suits Meet Roots: The Antecedents and Consequences of Community Engagement Strategy. [REVIEW]Frances Bowen, Aloysius Newenham-Kahindi & Irene Herremans - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 95 (2):297 - 318.
References found in this work
Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management.Archie B. Carroll - 2002 - South-Western College Pub./Thomson Learning.
A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation.R. Edward Freeman - 2001 - Perspectives in Business Ethics Sie 3:144.
Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies.Gøsta Esping-Andersen - 1998 - Oxford University Press UK.
Toward Effective Stakeholder Dialogue.Muel Kaptein & Rob Van Tulder - 2003 - Business and Society Review 108 (2):203-224.
Exploring Research Potentials and Applications for Multi-Stakeholder Learning Dialogues.Stephen L. Payne & Jerry M. Calton - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 55 (1):71-78.