Hypatia 2 (3):107 - 127 (1987)
In this paper I set out the problem of feminist social science as the need to explain and justify its method of theory choice in relation to both its own theories and those of androcentric social science. In doing this, it needs to avoid both a positivism which denies the impact of values on scientific theory-choice and a radical relativism which undercuts the emancipatory potential of feminist research. From the relevant literature I offer two possible solutions: the Holistic and the Constructivist models of theory-choice. I then rate these models according to what extent they solve the problem of feminist social science. I argue that the principal distinction between these models is in their contrasting conceptions of truth. Solving the problem of feminist social science will require understanding that what is at stake in the debate is our conception of truth. This understanding will serve to clarify, though not resolve, the various approaches to and disagreements over methodologies and explanations in feminist social science.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Theories and Things. [REVIEW]W. V. QUINE - 1962 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (51):234-244.
Citations of this work BETA
Introduction: Special Issue on Feminist Science Studies.Lynn Hankinson Nelson & Alison Wylie - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1).
Similar books and articles
Feminist Scholarship in the Sciences: Where Are We Now and When Can We Expect A Theoretical Breakthrough?Sue V. Rosser - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (3):5 - 17.
Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism.Brooke A. Ackerly - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
The Promise of Feminist Reflexivities: Developing Donna Haraway's Project for Feminist Science Studies.Kirsten Campbell - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1):162-182.
Why Gender is a Relevant Factor in the Social Epistemology of Scientific Inquiry.Kristina Rolin - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):880-891.
Feminist Philosophy of Science: 'Standpoint' and Knowledge. [REVIEW]Sharon Crasnow - 2008 - Science and Education 17 (10):1089-1110.
Consensus, Dissensus, and Democracy: What Is at Stake in Feminist Science Studies?Margret Grebowicz - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):989-1000.
Dismantling the Self/Other Dichotomy in Science: Towards a Feminist Model of the Immune System.Lisa Weasel - 2001 - Hypatia 16 (1):27-44.
Feminist Interventions in Ethics and Politics: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory.Barbara S. Andrew, Jean Clare Keller & Lisa H. Schwartzman (eds.) - 2005 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Feminist Epistemology: Implications for Philosophy of Science.Cassandra L. Pinnick - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (4):646-657.
Feminist Social and Political Theory: Contemporary Debates and Dialogues.Janice McLaughlin - 2003 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Feminist Theory in Science: Working Toward a Practical Transformation.Deboleena Roy - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1):255-279.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads59 ( #88,313 of 2,164,583 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #44,159 of 2,164,583 )
How can I increase my downloads?