Annual acknowledgement of manuscript reviewers

BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):14 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contributing reviewersThe editors of BMC Medical Ethics would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 13 (2012)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,213

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evidence for the Effectiveness of Peer Review.Robert H. Fletcher & Suzanne W. Fletcher - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):35-50.
Ethics of Field Research: Do Journals Set the Standard?Helene Marsh & Carole M. Eros - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (3):375-382.
Using a Dialectical Scientific Brief in Peer Review.Arthur E. Stamps - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):85-98.
Professional Ethics Considerations of Research Ethics Board Members in Canada.Maureen Muldoon - 2006 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 25 (1/4):67-80.
Ethical Issues in Journal Peer-Review.J. Angelo Corlett - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 2 (4):355-366.
Ethical Concerns of Reviewers: More Issues.V. Wiwanitkit - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (6):862-862.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-24

Downloads
90 (#134,420)

6 months
1 (#414,449)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references