On what it is like to be a man

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):355 – 366 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The human body is ?transmogrified? (caricatured) under physicalistic descriptions of it. These imply that it is a contingent fact that rational beings such as human persons have the sort of bodies they do have. (Or, that, say, baboons are not rational creatures.) The human body is ?transfigured? under a description that makes it necessary to the performance of rational functions, including speaking a language. Any view of the matter that excludes this notion, either by reduction to the physicalist treatment or simple denial, is inadequate

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

'What am I?' Descartes and the mind-body problem - reply. [REVIEW]Stephen Yablo - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):717-734.
The philosophy of the body.Stuart F. Spicker - 1970 - Chicago,: Quadrangle Books.
The constitution view of persons: A critique.William Hasker - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):23-34.
The contemporary significance of confucianism.Yijie Tang - 2008 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (4):477-501.
What Am I?: Descartes and the Mind-Body Problem.Joseph Almog - 2001 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-04

Downloads
49 (#303,863)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Description and expression: Physicalism restricted.Virgil Aldrich - 1977 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):149 – 164.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references