Surreal Time and Ultratasks

Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (4):836-847 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper suggests that time could have a much richer mathematical structure than that of the real numbers. Clark & Read (1984) argue that a hypertask (uncountably many tasks done in a finite length of time) cannot be performed. Assuming that time takes values in the real numbers, we give a trivial proof of this. If we instead take the surreal numbers as a model of time, then not only are hypertasks possible but so is an ultratask (a sequence which includes one task done for each ordinal number—thus a proper class of them). We argue that the surreal numbers are in some respects a better model of the temporal continuum than the real numbers as defined in mainstream mathematics, and that surreal time and hypertasks are mathematically possible.

Similar books and articles

The effective content of surreal algebra.Jacob Lurie - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):337-371.
The Effective Content of Surreal Algebra.Jacob Lurie - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):337-371.
Paul Paon's Sur-surreal Chimera.Monique Yaari - 1994 - Utopian Studies 5 (1):108 - 127.
Recursive surreal numbers.Leon Harkleroad - 1990 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (3):337-345.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-09

Downloads
1,839 (#4,947)

6 months
541 (#2,576)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Haidar Al-Dhalimy
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

Quick and Easy Recipes for Hypergunk.Patrick Reeder - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (1):178-191.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Parts of Classes.David K. Lewis - 1991 - Mind 100 (3):394-397.
Parts of Classes.Michael Potter - 1993 - Philosophical Quarterly 43 (172):362-366.

View all 9 references / Add more references